评论员：陈晓红
第59届慕尼黑安全会议于当地时间2023年2月18日至19日在世界瞩目中落下帷幕,近100个国家和地区的防务高官及专家与会。
会议的焦点定格在俄乌冲突，但并没有产生任何有实质性的助力俄乌“止战促和”方案。慕尼黑会议美国副总统哈里斯说,俄罗斯在乌克兰犯下反人类罪；英国首相思坦克说,现在是我们加倍向乌克兰提供军事援助的时刻；法国总统马克龙说,现在不是对话的时候；德国总理库尔茨说,让所有能提供主战坦克的人真正做到将坦克送往乌克兰；欧盟委员会主席冯德莱恩说,我们要加倍努力向乌克兰提供军事援助…这种一味向乌克兰提供武器是否符合人民的利益？是否能有效阻止战争？这样真能带来和平吗？
各位请思考：援助雇佣军和大量武器，这是否是在纵容战争的延续？明知故犯杀死更多的人呢？摧毁更多的亲手建立起来的繁华和美好呢？所有的武器用在战场上是否就意味着就是去杀人呢？而且是杀人没商量，你死我活，陌生人成了仇人！这完全不是人类非要互相残杀才能生存的模式，也完全不是人类发展的终极目标！那么问题来了，既然不是，那为什么不和谈？很多第三方为什么不劝和促谈,而去火上浇油？这是脑残了还是脑进水了？人类的基本权利法则就是自然生存，不人为致死，简称人权。
慕尼黑安委会,在传统上是与会者畅所欲言和观点交锋的平台。既然是安全会议,又是特别针对俄乌战争局势的议题，为什么当事国俄罗斯没有受邀出席？伊朗也不在名下？
我作为一名世界和平使者，我热爱和平,不带任何政治观点偏见。我关注到中国代表王毅在大声呐喊:中国不是乌克兰危机的当事方，但我们没有袖手旁观，不去火上浇油，中国所做的一切归结为一句话，就是劝和促谈。中国坚定的站在对话一边，站在和平一边。
中方领导人提到，主张各国主权领土完整都应得到尊重,联合国宪章宗旨原则都应得到遵守,各国合理安全关切都应得到重视,一切有利于和平解决危机的努力应得到支持,我们将重申核战争打不得，也打不赢。也呼吁保障民用核设施安全,反对攻击核电站,还将倡导共同反对使用生化武器。中方态度明显,劝和促谈，不袖手旁观，不火上浇油，更不趁火打劫。
拜登在“总统日”这天带着价值5亿美元的军事武器装备援助前往乌克兰,美国国内批评四起,批评他无视俄亥俄洲化学品泄漏等国内危机，在俄亥俄州人民急需帮助的当下,拜登却去访问乌克兰,而不是去看望本国受害者们。
众说云云，虽然川普喊话背后有着美国两党之间的竞争倾向，但川普为什么这么有把握承诺，如果他再次当选总统执政，俄罗斯永远不会在乌克兰进行特别军事行动,并保证在24小时内达成协议？难道这里面真有什么政治玄机吗？
地缘政治使美国国内改变了多年物价不涨的优势,物价上涨已直接影响到每个家庭生活水平。地缘政治也影响旅游行业的航线交通，航线停飞不但给旅游行业重创，更主要的是原本可以直飞的国家，现在非要绕道而行，跨越几个国家才能到达,是否剥夺了人们正常出行自由。
议员发声,川普隔空炮轰,民众上街游行,拜登政府是否可以重新调整国内和国际战略方针?毕竟一切政治服务民生最重要。
责任编辑：Hongmi Nina Chen
VIEWS AND COMMENTARY: CAN THE MUNICH SECURITY CONFERENCE BRING PEACE TO THE WORLD
Commentator: Chen Xiaohong
The 59th Munich Security Conference came to an end on February 18-19, 2023 local time, attracting worldwide attention. Senior defense officials and experts from nearly 100 countries and regions attended the meeting.
The focus of the meeting was fixed on the conflict between Russia and Ukraine, but it did not produce any substantive plans to help Russia and Ukraine “stop the war and promote peace”. At the Munich meeting, U.S. Vice President Harris said that Russia committed crimes against humanity in Ukraine; British Prime Minister Think tank said that it is time for us to double military aid to Ukraine; French President Macron said that now is not the time for dialogue; German Chancellor Kurz said that everyone who can provide main battle tanks can actually send tanks to Ukraine; European Commission President Von der Leyen said that we must redouble our efforts to provide military assistance to Ukraine… This kind of blind sending to Ukraine Is it in the interest of the people to provide arms? Can it effectively prevent war? Can this really bring peace?
Please think about it, everyone: Is aiding mercenaries and a large number of weapons condoning the continuation of the war? What about knowingly killing more people? How about destroying more prosperity and beauty built by oneself? Do all weapons used on the battlefield mean killing people? What’s more, it’s murder without discussion life, and death, strangers become enemies! This is not at all a model in which human beings have to kill each other to survive, and it is not at all the ultimate goal of human development! So here comes the question, if not, why no peace talks? Why do many third parties add fuel to the fire instead of persuading peace talks? Is this brain damage or brain flooding? The basic law of human rights is natural survival, not artificial death, referred to as human rights.
The Munich Security Council has traditionally been a platform for participants to speak freely and exchange views. Since it is a security meeting, and it is specifically about the situation of the Russia-Ukraine war, why was Russia not invited to attend? Iran is also not in the name.
As a world peace envoy, I love peace without any political bias. I noticed that Chinese representative Wang Yi was shouting loudly: China is not a party to the Ukraine crisis, but we did not stand by and add fuel to the flames. Everything China has done boils down to one sentence, which is to promote peace and talks. China firmly stands on the side of dialogue and peace.
The Chinese leader mentioned that the sovereignty and territorial integrity of all countries should be respected, the purposes and principles of the UN Charter should be respected, the legitimate security concerns of all countries should be taken seriously, and all efforts to resolve the crisis peacefully should be supported. Wars cannot be fought or won. It also calls for the protection of civilian nuclear facilities, opposes attacks on nuclear power plants, and advocates joint opposition to the use of biological and chemical weapons. China’s attitude is clear, to persuade peace and promote talks, not to stand idly by, not to add fuel to the flames, and not to take advantage of the fire.
Biden went to Ukraine with $500 million worth of military equipment aid on “President’s Day”. There were criticisms in the United States, criticizing him for ignoring domestic crises such as the chemical spill in Ohio. Instead of visiting the victims in his own country, Biden went to visit Ukraine.
To sum up, although there is a tendency of competition between the two parties in the United States behind Trump’s propaganda, why does Trump promise so confidently that if he is re-elected as president, Russia will never conduct special military operations in Ukraine, and promise A deal within hours? Is there really any political mystery in it?
Geopolitics has changed the domestic advantage of not rising prices for many years, and rising prices have directly affected the living standards of every family. Geopolitics also affects the airline traffic of the tourism industry. The grounding of airlines severely damages the tourism industry, but more importantly, countries that could have direct flights now have to take detours and cross several countries to reach them. Is it depriving people of everyday travel?
Congressmen spoke out, Trump bombarded from the air, and people took to the streets to march. Can the Biden administration readjust domestic and international strategies? It must go through all politics to serve the people’s livelihood.
Editor：Hongmi Nina Chen
